 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
|
Divorce Lawyers PhiladelphiaJanuary 3, 2008CohabitationEvidence that ex-wife and her boyfriend did not intermingle any funds, and neither paid any money towards the other’s household expenses supported a finding that they were not engaged in a conjugal relationship; the boyfriend testified that he would occasionally buy food for the ex-wife as a recompense for that which he had consumed as leftovers and that he would replenish gas in her car on those occasions that he would use it. No CommentsNo comments yet. RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time. |
|
Powered by WordPress
 |
 |
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Before Filing
1 After Filing |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2008 Divorce Lawyers Philadelphia
This website contains legal information, and not legal advice. It's content refers only to the law of the State of Pennsylvania. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
   |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
